Councils › Manningham
Manningham traffic signals
83 signals with traffic counts in Manningham, from 2023 to 3 Oct 2026.
- Signals83in Manningham
- With recent counts78counted in the last 12 months
- Busiest weekday volume98,113vehicles per weekday, Doncaster / High
- Ready for turning counts12set up to show turning movements
Busiest signals
Where Manningham is busiest
The ten signals with the most traffic on an average weekday. A signal where faulty detectors left out most of the traffic is not ranked.
| Signal | Weekday volume | AM peak | PM peak | Open in the map |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doncaster / HighSite 2830 | 98,113 | 6,920 | 7,989 | Open |
| Fitzsimons North of ParkwoodSite 1529 | 97,849 | 7,922 | 8,293 | Open |
| Manningham / BulleenSite 686 | 83,763 | 6,440 | 6,511 | Open |
| Eastern Fwy / DoncasterSite 2828 | 75,112 | 5,721 | 6,332 | Open |
| Fitzsimons / Porter / WilliamsonsSite 725 | 73,843 | 5,656 | 6,099 | Open |
| Williamsons / FooteSite 700 | 71,083 | 5,338 | 5,691 | Open |
| Doncaster / Tram / WilliamsonsSite 325 | 70,983 | 5,065 | 5,494 | Open |
| Springvale / Eastern Fwy / EastlinkSite 576 | 69,130 | 5,093 | 5,518 | Open |
| Williamsons / Shop Town Ent NSite 318 | 68,744 | 4,362 | 5,474 | Open |
| Doncaster / Frederick / ShoppingSite 326 | 67,783 | 4,251 | 5,331 | Open |
Weekday volume is vehicles per weekday; peaks are vehicles in the busiest hour of the morning and afternoon.
Worth a look
Signals worth a look
Signals with crashes, detector changes, a gap in counts or a large change in volume. A starting point for a closer look, not a verdict.
-
High / ManninghamOpen
- Fatal/serious crashes: 2 (5 yrs)
- High crash rate (0.11 per million)
-
Doncaster / DrydenOpen
- Fatal/serious crashes: 2 (5 yrs)
- High crash rate (0.11 per million)
-
Foote / HighOpen
- Fatal/serious crashes: 2 (5 yrs)
- High crash rate (0.18 per million)
-
Warrandyte-Ringwood / FalconerOpen
- Fatal/serious crashes: 2 (5 yrs)
- High crash rate (0.31 per million)
-
Manningham / BulleenOpen
- Fatal/serious crashes: 3 (5 yrs)
- OP sheet older than the last detector change
Why these signals?
- Fatal/serious crashes: 2 or more fatal or serious injury crashes at the signal, 1 Jan 2021 to 31 Dec 2025 (the last five full calendar years).
- High crash rate: injury crashes per million entering vehicles in the top 10% of the council's 67 rated signals (0.11 or more), counting only signals with 5,000+ weekday vehicles and 3+ crashes. A rate needs a full year of counts (300+ days) behind it.
- Detector changes: 2 or more start, stop or shift events in the last 12 months, or any in the last 90 days of the record.
- OP sheet older: the date printed on the published sheet is earlier than the last detector change, so its layout may be out of date.
- Silent: no counts for more than 60 days before the end of the record.
- Mostly faulty detectors: more than 50% of the signal's traffic over its last 12 months was on detectors left out as faulty. Such a signal gets no volume-growth or crash-rate reason, because its volume covers the working lanes only.
- Volume: 10% or more up or down year on year. Withheld where detectors changed and too little traffic stayed on the loops counted both years.
- Ranked by crash reasons first, then fatal/serious crashes, then the number of other reasons, then weekday volume. Signals with no reason are not listed.
See every signal in Manningham
Turning movements, peak hours, crashes and speed limits for each signal, in one map.
About this data
What these figures are
Counts come from the vehicle detectors at traffic signals across Victoria. Weekday volume is the average number of vehicles through a signal on a weekday, and the AM and PM peaks are the busiest hour of the morning and afternoon, each over the signal’s most recent 12 months of counts. Detectors that are faulty are left out. Updated regularly.
Source: Department of Transport and Planning, via DataVic (Traffic Signal Volume Data and Victorian Traffic Signals), licensed CC BY 4.0. Independent; not affiliated with any road authority. Indicative analysis; verify against official sources before relying on it. See data coverage for how each figure is worked out.